If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Exciting News: Chaos acquires EvolveLAB = AI-Powered Design.
To learn more, please visit this page!
New! You can now log in to the forums with your chaos.com account as well as your forum account.
its both i wrote it in there, knowing i mispelled it, but knowing that some of you will pick it out ...since it wasnt my intention to make you all actually believe me for 100% anyway...it was fun.
But, for real. If such scene was to be rendered on 80 core machine, it actually would take longer to render then 0.3 seconds, because of the voxelization time and antialiasing time per bucket. Would be something like 5-8 seconds
I will be getting myself a QX6700 soon, and clocking that sucker up to 3.5ghz. It will be more than 4 times faster than my current X2 which is only less than 2 years old
Lol, ditto, went from X2 to dualcore 6600s to now quadcore 6600.
Can I suggest the Xeon 3220 or Q6600 instead of the QX6700? I have 3 of them, and they all do between 3456MHz and 3546MHz on air cooling with the Ultra-120 Extreme. That is on the P5B Deluxe and the P5K deluxe, forget the P5W_DH, it hates quadcore overclocked. Which was a shame, as I had 2 of them.
I will be getting myself a QX6700 soon, and clocking that sucker up to 3.5ghz. It will be more than 4 times faster than my current X2 which is only less than 2 years old
Lol, ditto, went from X2 to dualcore 6600s to now quadcore 6600.
Can I suggest the Xeon 3220 or Q6600 instead of the QX6700? I have 3 of them, and they all do between 3456MHz and 3546MHz on air cooling with the Ultra-120 Extreme. That is on the P5B Deluxe and the P5K deluxe, forget the P5W_DH, it hates quadcore overclocked. Which was a shame, as I had 2 of them.
A very cheap solution to the renderfarm...
I m building exactly the same setup P5K + XEON X3210 + 4Gb ram I dont have received yet all parts but I plan to run it @ 3.5Ghz
Even if its not a X3220 I think that this X3210 would run higher speed because its stock VID is lower than the X3220.
But you are right : this is a very good choice compared to a QX6700 or a Q6600 that have a lower quality (need more voltage for the same speed) than the X3220 or X3210.
But you are right : this is a very good choice compared to a QX6700 or a Q6600 that have a lower quality (need more voltage for the same speed) than the X3220 or X3210.
Hope you are right - my experience is that the X3220 runs exactly the same as my Q6600s - same voltage, same heat, same top end. Let us know how you get on.
Here is my Q6600 on a P5B deluxe at 3600 MHz running Vista 64 bit, MAX9 - just cracks the 2 minute mark.
I will be running it 24/7 at a little over 3500Mhz.
Different times on different OS / Max versions
Interesting stats on another machine Q6600 @ 3420 MHz, 1G ram
That doesnt suprise me, max8 is slower been mentioned many times before. And 64bit is often a little quicker just due to teh way it handles the memory better.
Any chance you could post all your Q6600 OC settings PM if needs be. I have the same mobo and a E6430 running at 3.2ghz (just for now till I have more time to crank it up) and will be getting a Quad core late july when the prices drop.
teabag:
It has been mentioned before and a few peope are running vray and vista, from what I recall its a matter of right clicking and choose run as admiistrator when installing... I believe.
Other than that, I wouldnt recommend vista anyway. not yet atleast.
I'm going to install Vista today. I need to test firewall under Vista, so my betatest subscription continue
But certainly Win2K3 x64 will still remain installed also.
I just can't seem to trust myself
So what chance does that leave, for anyone else?
---------------------------------------------------------
CG Artist
I will be getting myself a QX6700 soon, and clocking that sucker up to 3.5ghz. It will be more than 4 times faster than my current X2 which is only less than 2 years old
Lol, ditto, went from X2 to dualcore 6600s to now quadcore 6600.
Can I suggest the Xeon 3220 or Q6600 instead of the QX6700? I have 3 of them, and they all do between 3456MHz and 3546MHz on air cooling with the Ultra-120 Extreme. That is on the P5B Deluxe and the P5K deluxe, forget the P5W_DH, it hates quadcore overclocked. Which was a shame, as I had 2 of them.
A very cheap solution to the renderfarm...
I m building exactly the same setup P5K + XEON X3210 + 4Gb ram I dont have received yet all parts but I plan to run it @ 3.5Ghz
Even if its not a X3220 I think that this X3210 would run higher speed because its stock VID is lower than the X3220.
But you are right : this is a very good choice compared to a QX6700 or a Q6600 that have a lower quality (need more voltage for the same speed) than the X3220 or X3210.
Ok here is my first test with my new setup :
Xeon quad core X3210 (400€ for now but its price would drop soon)
original frequency = 2.13Ghz
occed frequency = 3.3Ghz (7x470)
Render time under XP pro 32bits / Vray RC4 = 1m32s :P ...
I m still on air cooling so I cant push the cpu more for now.
With a good watercooling system, I pretty sure to render it under the minute ...
n6 is correct there are also X3xx quad core xeons too.
But I think they are just limited to 1 CPU per mobo?
Whats your temps like n6?
I current have my E6420 @ 3.2ghz and temps are low to mid 30's idle and mid 40's under load. I would imagine yours would be around 10C higher due to the extra 2 cores.
Im using a thermalright ultra 120 extreme too.
Comment